(Gurrinder Chadha’s film
Viceroy’s House released last year reveals Churchill to be the real author of
the conspiracy to partition India as well as Kashmir!)
Last year a
British Indian Director, Gurinder Chadha released a movie “Viceroy’s House”
about the partition of India. The feature film is based on the goings-on at
Viceroy’s House (now Rashtrapati Bhavan) in Delhi. The film blames Winston
Churchill for the partition of India. Chadha originally hails from Jhelum in
Pakistani Punjab. She had to hurriedly migrate with her mother and spent some
time in a refugee camp. Gurinder Chada in an interview to a movie journal says,
“My film is based on Top-Secret British documents
that look at what Britain and America had to gain from the Partition of India
and the creation of Pakistan. As part of my research I read Narindra Singh
Sarila’s The Shadow Of The Great Game, which exposes these Top Secret
Government files that had been sealed for fifty years. These documents show
that the decision to divide India was influenced by the World Map and who would
retain power in the region”.
After the end of the
World War II, the west was keen to restrict the influence of their war time
allay Stalin. Both Britain and America wanted to restrict Russian approach to
the Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf. They were keen to create a corridor by
partitioning India to restrict the Russian advance. Lord Archibald Wavell at
Churchill’s behest drew a secret plan to divide India. The war-time prime minister, who otherwise
fiercely opposed the concession of freedom to India, analysed Jawaharlal Nehru
as being pro-Soviet Union and therefore likely to give the Communist power
access to the warm water port of Karachi and consequently an easy passage to
the Middle East. In contrast, he assessed the Muslim leadership demanding
Pakistan as being pro-West and therefore likely to be resistant to Moscow.
The partition plan
was discussed and prepared in the War Cabinet Meeting held on May 19, 1945. In
the movie Wavell gives a file to Cyril Radcliffe containing the secret note
circulated after the cabinet meeting. The movie has some shots showing the
actual file which is now declassified by the Home Office. Radcliffe had been
sent to demarcate the border between the two new countries. He had never
visited India before. He was given just few weeks to do the job. When he
mentions to Lord Ismay that it is impossible to undertake such an assignment in
such a short time, Lord Ismay shows him a map in the file where in the entire
border is already marked in red! He tells Radcliffe that he has only to
demarcate the border on the ground as already decided by the Cabinet Mission!
Incidentally, the partition plan was given the name of Mount Batten Plan and
ironically Mount Batten knew nothing about it. He was called to England just to
give the impression that it was his plan! It was a plan already prepared by
Lord Archibald Wavell at Churchill’s behest and handed over to him for
implementation!
Ashish Ray in London
Tribune writes, “In the “great game” of carving out spheres of influence
between Britain and the Soviet Union, Churchill was attempting to checkmate
what he perceived to be the United Kingdom’s post-war, Cold War rival; but at a
heavy cost to the people of India.
The fact is access to the waters of the Arabian
Sea through Pakistan has been denied to Russia to date. But if Churchill’s
objective was to thwart communist enlargement and hegemony, he has failed, for
China is comfortably ensconced not merely in Karachi, but in Gwadar, which is
even closer to the Gulf.”
Rakesh Ankit after studying the de-classified documents
wrote a detailed research paper on the subject, “The Cold War and its Impact on
the Evolution of the Kashmir Crisis, 1947-48” which appeared in the Journal of
the Oxford University History Society in 2009.According to him, “‘Power
Politics’ made a large contribution to the evolution of the Kashmir crisis.
While the dispute emerged for local, regional and religious reasons its
evolution and eventual ‘internationalization’ bears the stamp of concerns which
had nothing to do with the individuality of the crisis and the merits of the
cases of the two protagonists. In other words, while the events in and around
the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir from August 1947 to January 1949, a
period which saw an entire range of conflict, from local skirmishes to
full-fledged invasion to pitched defensive warfare, were manufactured by a set
of circumstances, personalities and concerns, which were all essentially local
or regional and sub-continental or religious in nature, once the crisis erupted
it was manipulated by the British-led Western Block, as far as possible, in the
pursuit of its own vital interests stretching from the Middle East to Central
Asia to the Far East.
These vital interests can be broadly categorised as
defensive, strategic and geo-political (aimed at the former Communist USSR) and
ideological or religious (aimed at the Islamic Middle East).” In fact, Rakesh
has quoted extract from Bevin’s letter to Marshall which states, “Kashmir was
on the Soviet frontier. Russia might well intervene as she had in Greece and
China, playing on the tribes and on communal feeling. Whoever controlled the
valley of Kashmir controlled the strategic and commercial communications
between India, Pakistan and Central Asia.” The main western interest was the
access to Central Asia and containment of the Communist Russia.
In fact, it was decided in a meeting in Paris between
Bevin and Marshall that the Anglo-American interests would be best served by
keeping the Kashmir corridor passing through Gilgit with Pakistan as India
could create problems. The ceasefire and the extent of areas under each country
too were decided by the western powers as both the armies at that time were
controlled by the British Officers. The details of the intrigues, conspiracies
or even the actual happenings on the ground have been put down by many authors
like Lord Birdwood, Dr. Josef Korbel, Alistair Lamb and recently by Christopher
Snedden. In spite of these vast resources about the happenings of 1947, to
simply put all the blame on Mohammad Ali Jinnah is not fair!”
Incidentally, the so called Tribal Raid is also alleged
to be a British Plan. They did not want the Maharaja to completely accede to
India as it would mean loss of the strategic corridor. They wanted the Indian
Army to be sent to Kashmir but there was no excuse to do that. David Devadas
writes in his book that the Indian Army Chief who was British knew three days
in advance that the Tribesmen were coming but he did not inform Nehru. It is
also alleged that all the Tribesmen were not from the Pushtoon Tribal Area.
There were quite a few mercenaries who were from Agha Khans Tribe in Hunza who
indulged in loot and rape rather than complete their mission of capturing
Srinagar! These were allegedly arranged by the British. The raid gave the
Indian Army an excuse to land in Kashmir. Again the Indian Army did not go all
the way to capture Muzaffarabad or even Gilgit which they could easily do but
stopped leaving the strategic corridor to Pakistanis as had been envisaged in
Bevin-Marshall meeting!
Adil Najam, Dean, Frederick S. Pardee School of Global Studies, Boston
University wrote a detailed article on Errors of Royalty in the partition of
India, which appeared on August 15, 2017. One would like to conclude with his
last para.
“Nowhere
does the unfinished business of partition bleed more profusely than in the
continuing conflict between India and Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir. Would
a little more attention and a few more weeks of effort in 1947 have spared the
world a nuclear-tipped time bomb that keeps ticking on both sides? We can never
know the answer to this question.
Nor can, or should, I believe, India and Pakistan blame
the British and Mountbatten for all their problems. Seventy-one years on, they
have only themselves to blame for missing opportunity after opportunity to fix
the troubled relationship they inherited.
However, maybe, today, on the anniversary of their birth,
both India and Pakistan can take a break from simply bashing each other and
recognize that at times history can deal you a bad hand in many different ways
– in this case, due to the hasty and monumental errors of a British royalty.
But also recognize, it is on you to learn from history and fix it”.
It is ironical that both the countries look towards these
conspirators to bail them out of the mess in which initially they put them! The most surprising fact about the movie is its virtual
ignorance among the people in India and Pakistan. Has it been deliberately
suppressed by both the countries? May be because of so many uncomfortable
questions it raises about partition!